This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.
An employer that was "acutely aware" of an employee's "mental health fragility" acted unreasonably when handling his return to full duties and his complaint about a manager, a commission has found.
The Woolstar storeman sought permanent impairment and workers' compensation for depression, which he claimed he sustained due to "harassment and bullying" regarding a return-to-work process and allocation of light duties.
But the employer denied liability, noting the employee's psychological condition was secondary to his physical injury, and not a primary injury...
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.
HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:
Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more