Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Softer drug sanctions involved "markedly different" circumstances

An employee who admitted to smoking marijuana while on annual leave was not unfairly sacked over a positive test when he returned to work, nor treated less fairly than his colleagues, the Fair Work Commission has found.

Last year, seven hours into a shift, the DP World Brisbane stevedore returned a non-negative result for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in a random drug test. A further test detected 562uh/L of THC in his urine – well over the employer's definition of "high" (anything above 60ug/L).

At a show-cause meeting, the employee admitted to having smoked a "small joint" the night before the test but maintained he was not drug-affected while on shift; he said he felt "completely like [himself]" the next day. He also gave a "100% commitment" that it would never happen again.

But after considering his response, the employer sacked him for breaching its alcohol and other drugs (AOD) policy and its "critical safety commitments"...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more