Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Refusing to offer anti-vaxxer shifts wasn't a dismissal

An employee who wouldn't consent to being "stabbed" with "poison" has failed to prove her employer dismissed her when it refused to send her to client sites.

The Randstad on-hire employee applied to the Fair Work Commission to deal with a general protections dispute involving her dismissal in December last year, but Randstad objected on jurisdictional grounds, denying it sacked her.

The employer told the Commission it employed the worker in October 2019 as a casual outside-school-hours care assistant. It offered her about 100 shifts to work between then and 25 November; the worker accepted five.

Following the Queensland Government's mandatory COVID-19 vaccination direction for workers in high-risk settings, Randstad sought confirmation of the worker's vaccination status, but she responded that she hadn't seen the direction and would keep her status private...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more