Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Lack of response to restraint accusations was "highly regrettable"

A company could potentially have avoided litigation if it had responded to a warning that its new employee was breaching his confidentiality and non-compete obligations to his former employer, a court has found.

Construction and mining specialist Marble Recruitment sought urgent restraints against a former senior recruitment consultant and his new employer, Fetch Recruitment, pending a determination on its claims that the consultant had breached his employment contract and improperly used its information.

Despite a delay in Marble applying for interlocutory relief after becoming aware of the consultant's potential breaches, Western Australian Supreme Court Justice Michael Lundberg found there were "serious questions to be tried" regarding several aspects of its claims...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more