Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

HR advisor defends processing casual's "resignation", adverse action claim rejected

An HR advisor removed an employee from a casual pool because she repeatedly failed to indicate her work availabilities, and not because of her complaints and protected attributes, the Federal Circuit Court has ruled.

The Action Industrial Catering casual 'utility' employee claimed the employer took adverse action against her when it failed to undertake proper investigations and later dismissed her, because of her workplace complaints and enquiries, race, physical disability and/or carer's responsibilities.

The Court heard the employee, who worked on a fly-in, fly-out basis at various mining sites, identified as Aboriginal, had diabetes, and cared for her young daughter who was ill...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more