Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Employer defends banning applications from 'rude, aggressive' jobseeker

An employer didn't breach discrimination laws when it banned a job applicant from applying for future roles after he sent "intemperate" and "abusive" emails to its recruiters, a tribunal has ruled.

The applicant alleged RMIT University had discriminated against him in early 2020 when it rejected his numerous job applications, and prevented him from further communicating with any of its staff, despite the fact he was "amply qualified, skilled and experienced".

He said it took these actions based on his age, employment activity, industrial activity, physical features, political beliefs, race, and religious beliefs.

Hearing RMIT's bid to dismiss the application, Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Member Ian Scott found most of the applicant's claims lacked substance, but he concluded that RMIT had failed to discharge its burden in relation to potential age, race and industrial activity discrimination...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more