Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

Employee's reporting obligations were "unambiguous", dismissal upheld

An employee who relied on legal advice and delayed informing his workplace of pending criminal charges has been denied permission to appeal his failed unfair dismissal claim, with a full bench affirming his workplace reporting obligations outweighed his lawyer's advice.

The Sydney Trains employee, who had worked for the employer for 37 years, was dismissed in October last year for failing to "immediately" report 12 "serious" criminal charges, as required under its code of conduct.

In unfair dismissal proceedings, Commissioner Donna McKenna heard the employee had acted on advice from his lawyer to "hold off" on reporting the charges until they had settled on the agreed facts with the prosecutor, and that the employer had only become aware of the drug and weapon charges 11 months later, through an anonymous tip-off...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more