Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

"Difficult" to separate redundancy decision from employee's complaints: court

An employer has failed to prove it selected an employee with a "negative attitude" for redundancy because of his poor performance, and not because he made bullying and safety complaints.

After Mondiale International informed the truck driver in April 2020 that his role was redundant, he claimed this was adverse action, alleging his employment was terminated because he'd made numerous complaints and enquiries over the previous 15 months.

The Federal Circuit Court heard the employee had challenged two written warnings he received; the first related to a public complaint about his erratic driving and the second was regarding his failure to report rest and other breaks during shifts.

In mid-2019, he raised concerns about: a disproportionate reduction in his work hours; inequitable access to night and weekend work; and safety issues related to fatigue management and trailer loading...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more