Log in or become a subscriber
This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.
"Pet names" and workplace touching warranted disciplinary action
An employee has unsuccessfully argued he was denied a chance to "be more vigilant" about his workplace behaviour because his colleagues didn't expressly say he made them feel uncomfortable.
Log in or become a subscriber
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
HR Daily Premium membership
Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.
HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:
Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more