Log in or become a subscriber

This content requires HR Daily Premium membership. Log in below or sign up here.

No obligation to redeploy to associated but 'entirely separate' entities

An employee has failed to prove that she should have been redeployed into one of several available roles in her employer's associated entities when it was deciding whether to make her role redundant.

In August last year, due to its reduced financial position and uncertain future, UQ Sport's HR manager told the project coordinator, who was on parental leave at the time, that the employer was considering making her role redundant.

The HR manager said he could redeploy the employee into a full-time customer service role or part-time shift supervisor role, but the employee said these were unsuitable.

She also said she was unhappy the employer hadn't brought up the potential for redundancy at the start of her parental leave in November 2020...

Log in or become a subscriber
Subscriber login

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

HR Daily Premium membership

Sign up now for all the benefits of HR Daily Premium membership.

Join here to stay informed

HR Daily Premium members are Australia's best-informed HR leaders and practitioners when it comes to HR news, thought leadership, legal compliance and emerging trends. Unlock premium membership to receive:

Full access to our news library Breaking news updates each day Complimentary passes to all webinars Webcasts streaming on demand Q&A sessions on hot topics And much more